What is the synonym of burden?

Synonyms. load. encumbrance. weight. 2 (noun) in the sense of trouble.

What is the opposite of the burden of proof?

Similarly, in some cases there may be a reverse burden of proof (also known as reverse burden or reverse onus), where a defendant in a criminal trial must prove their innocence, as contrasted with a “regular” burden, where the prosecution must prove the defendant’s guilt.

Which are the antonyms?

An antonym is a word whose meaning is directly opposite to another word’s meaning. In this thesaurus, an antonym is a word that has a meaning that completely cancels out another words meaning.

What are two antonyms for trudged?

  • trudge. verb. ( ˈtrʌdʒ) Walk heavily and firmly, as when weary, or through mud. Antonyms. ride clean misbehave idle lower decrease cycle. squelch squish slop tramp footslog.
  • trudge. noun. ( ˈtrʌdʒ) A long difficult walk. Antonyms. starve stay in place understate empty. tramp hike.

What is burden of rebuttal?

Both teams have a burden of rebuttal which shifts from side to side as the debate progresses. There are two elements involved in the burden of rebuttal: a) Each team is obligated to refute their opponent’s arguments. b) Each team is obligated to rebuild and defend their own case. The Preponderance of Evidence.

What does burden mean in law?

A burden is a generic term referring to a restriction on a use or activity. Often, the term arises in property law. For instance, real property may carry an intangible burden in the form of covenants or easements.

What are the 3 burdens of proof?

The burden of proof is a legal standard that requires parties to provide evidence to demonstrate that a claim is valid. Three levels of the burden of proof, “beyond a reasonable doubt,” a “preponderance of the evidence,” and “clear and convincing” determine the level of evidence required for a claim.

What’s the difference between burden of proof and preponderance of the evidence?

Preponderance of the evidence is one type of evidentiary standard used in a burden of proof analysis. Under the preponderance standard, the burden of proof is met when the party with the burden convinces the fact finder that there is a greater than 50% chance that the claim is true.

What is the other term for burden of proof?

n. •burden of proof (noun) responsibility, onus probandi, onus.

What is prima facie case?

A prima facie case is the establishment of a legally required rebuttable presumption. A prima facie case is a cause of action or defense that is sufficiently established by a party’s evidence to justify a verdict in his or her favor, provided such evidence is not rebutted by the other party.

What is the equipoise rule?

The equipoise rule provides that where the evidence in a criminal case is evenly balanced, the constitutional, presumption of innocence tilts the scales in favor of the accused.

Why is the burden of proof important?

A ‘persuasive’ [legal] burden of proof requires the accused to prove, on a balance of probabilities, a fact which is essential to the determination of his guilt or innocence. It reverses the burden of proof by removing it from the prosecution and transferring it to the accused.

What is onus of proof in law?

The term “onus of proof” refers to this obligation of the prosecution to prove the case against the accused and it is a term that is often used in courts, particularly in criminal trials.

What is res gestae law?

The term res gestae has been defined as “those circumstances which are the undesigned incidents of a particular litigated act and which are admissible when illustrative of such act.” In a general way, res gestae refers to the circumstances, facts, and declarations that grow out of the main fact and serve to illustrate …

What is qualified seduction?

Qualified seduction is a crime punished under our criminal laws for the act of seducing a virgin aged 13 to 17 years old by certain persons such as a person in authority, priest, teacher, and the like.

What is meant by proof beyond reasonable doubt?

In a criminal case, the prosecution bears the burden of proving that the defendant is guilty beyond all reasonable doubt. This means that the prosecution must convince the jury that there is no other reasonable explanation that can come from the evidence presented at trial.

How do you disprove circumstantial evidence?

The first is to cast doubt on the circumstantial proof itself. If the premise(s) are not proven, then the inference should not be drawn. The second is to show that even if all the circumstantial facts are true, they lead to two or more reasonable conclusions.

What is an equivocal act?

statements accompanying and equivocal act, otherwise known as verbal acts, on the theory that they are the verbal parts of the act to be explained.

Are excited utterances admissible?

Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, an excited utterance is defined as a statement that concerns a startling event, made by the declarant when the declarant is still under stress from the startling event. An excited utterance is admissible under an exception to the hearsay rule.

Is hearsay evidence ever admissible in court?

— A witness can testify only to those facts which he knows of his personal knowledge; that is, which are derived from his own perception, except as otherwise provided in these rules. The general rule is that hearsay evidence is not admissible in court.

Can a person be found guilty without evidence?

It is not necessary for the accused person to prove his case beyond a reasonable doubt or in default to incur a verdict of guilty. The onus of proof lying upon the accused person is to prove his case by a preponderance of probability.”

What are the two burdens of proof?

The burden of proof is often said to consist of two distinct but related concepts: the burden of production, and the burden of persuasion.

Can an accused be convicted of circumstantial evidence alone?

– Circumstantial evidence is sufficient for conviction if: (1) There is more than one circumstance; (2) The facts from which the inferences are derived are proven; (3) The combination of all the circumstances is such as to produce a conviction beyond a reasonable doubt.